[Openid-specs-mobile-profile] MODRNA WG Call

Nat Sakimura sakimura at gmail.com
Fri Jul 17 05:33:42 UTC 2015


A third option would be to creat a terms and definitions spec and refer if
from all three.

Nat

On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Lodderstedt, Torsten <t.lodderstedt at telekom.de>
wrote:

>  Then (if no one objects) I would suggest to go with (2)
>
>
>
> *Von:* Hjelm, Bjorn [mailto:Bjorn.Hjelm at VerizonWireless.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Bjorn.Hjelm at VerizonWireless.com');>]
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 16. Juli 2015 10:24
> *An:* Torsten Lodderstedt
> *Cc:* Lodderstedt, Torsten; Openid-specs-mobile-profile
> *Betreff:* Re: [Openid-specs-mobile-profile] MODRNA WG Call
>
>
>
> Torsten,
>
> Either options are ok with me and would suffice to maintain consistency
> among the specifications.
>
> BR,
>
> Bjorn
>
>
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 10:29 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten at lodderstedt.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','torsten at lodderstedt.net');>> wrote:
>
>  Bjorn,
>
> we don't have such a repo. I see two options: (1) we put a terminology
> page into the wiki or (2) we ensure (through review) consistency among
> specs.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Best regards,
> Torsten.
>
> Am 16. Juli 2015 00:24:50 MESZ, schrieb "Hjelm, Bjorn" <
> Bjorn.Hjelm at VerizonWireless.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Bjorn.Hjelm at VerizonWireless.com');>>:
>
> Torsten,
>
> Do we’ve a repository for terminology to ensure we use the same for all
> three specifications?
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Bjorn
>
>
>
> *From:* Lodderstedt, Torsten [mailto:t.lodderstedt at telekom.de
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','t.lodderstedt at telekom.de');>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 16, 2015 11:19 PM
> *To:* Hjelm, Bjorn
> *Cc:* Openid-specs-mobile-profile
> *Subject:* AW: [Openid-specs-mobile-profile] MODRNA WG Call
>
>
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
>
>
> thanks for sharing this document with us.
>
>
>
> Here are my comments:
>
> -          1. – “asserted by a primary MNO that the client has a
> relationship with” – That’s one option. Another could be that the statement
> is issued by a central registry all MNOs rely on. So my suggestion for this
> spec is to talk of a “trusted entity, e.g. a primary MNO” – potentially
> also “developer MNO”
>
> -          1.2 Terminology: I think this should be replaced by MODRNA
> specific terminology, e.g. MNO
>
> -          3.1. Editors Note 1: I would suggest to add a implementation
> note section and explain the options we see there, including using the
> statement as client_id -> note: If the operators uses the statement as
> client_id it won’t most likely not issue a secret, which contradicts the
> text in the first sentence of this section.
>
> -          3.1, 2nd paragraph: “If the client is registered with another
> MNO, a new version of the application is required.” – What does “new
> application” mean?
>
> -          3.1. Editors note 3: I think the introduction or a
> requirements section should state that this spec will support this feature.
>
> -          3.2
>
> o   Signature algorithm – I suggest we limit this to RSA (to start with)
>
> o   What is/are “acus”?
>
> o   What’s “gti”?
>
>
>
> best regards,
>
> Torsten.
>
>
>
> *Von:* Hjelm, Bjorn [mailto:Bjorn.Hjelm at VerizonWireless.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Bjorn.Hjelm at VerizonWireless.com');>]
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2015 02:50
> *An:* Lodderstedt, Torsten; Openid-specs-mobile-profile
> *Betreff:* RE: [Openid-specs-mobile-profile] MODRNA WG Call
>
>
>
> Attached is a revised version of the draft registration spec.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Bjorn
>
>
>
> -----Original Appointment-----
> *From:* Lodderstedt, Torsten [mailto:t.lodderstedt at telekom.de
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','t.lodderstedt at telekom.de');>]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 18, 2015 10:17 AM
> *To:* Lodderstedt, Torsten; Openid-specs-mobile-profile
> *Subject:* [Openid-specs-mobile-profile] MODRNA WG Call
> *When:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 4:00 PM-5:00 PM (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam,
> Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna.
> *Where:* https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/764054389
>
>
>
>
>
> Zeit: Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2015 16:00-17:00 (UTC+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin,
> Bern, Rom, Stockholm, Wien.
>
> Ort: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/764054389
>
>
>
> Hinweis: Die oben angegebene Abweichung von GMT berücksichtigt keine
> Anpassungen für Sommerzeit.
>
>
>
> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I won’t be able to attend but John will moderate the call instead
> (thanks!).
>
>
>
> I would suggest the following topics:
>
> ·         Discussion of discovery design (native vs. web – probably using
> sequence diagrams)
>
> ·         Status of registration spec (esp. software statement contents)
>
> ·         Alignment of GSMA work and authentication draft
>
>
>
> best regards,
>
> Torsten.
>
>   << File: ATT00002.txt >>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Openid-specs-mobile-profile mailing list
> Openid-specs-mobile-profile at lists.openid.net <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Openid-specs-mobile-profile at lists.openid.net');>
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-mobile-profile
>
>

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-mobile-profile/attachments/20150717/fa285ba1/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-mobile-profile mailing list