[Openid-specs-heart] Survey

[Boyd, Thompson]

2   A - Our standards work is incomplete. The standards work is a work in progress.
1   B - Implementation of our profiles is too expensive. Entities need to perceive the "value", first.
2   C - Why would a hospital want to make patient-directed access easier? Need patients as customers. Need to have patient engagement. Patients need to be in the "center". Patients are part of their careteam.
     D - HEART distracts the patient from the hospital's portal experience. HEART is more a more enriching experience for the patient. More patient choice, with more security.
4   E - US regulations are inadequate from a patient rights perspective. We need to be thinking, internationally.
2   F - NATE and other HIE groups don't see the value of HEART to their business or mission. It takes time.
1   G - Patient-directed exchange does not allow the patient to pay for API access. This can be worked out. This may not matter with risk-bearing ACOs where there is greater financial risk posed on Providers.
3   H - CMS and VA have not endorsed HEART or put it on their road map. CMS and the VA need to see more examples.
3   I - We have not done enough PR and promotion. Agree, more PR needs to be done, throughout the various organizations to which we are affiliated as members.
1   J - People don't know about it and don't understand it's value. It takes time. More examples need to be available to the Health IT Community and Stakeholders.
1   K - Patients do not typically do not have access to their data from which to control an exchange. Agree, systems, need to be in place, for patients to have more control over who sees their data, as discussed in the JASON Report.
     L - Other________________________

Thompson Boyd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20171106/edb9f374/attachment.html>