[Openid-specs-heart] Proposal for reworked use case AND use case template

[Eve Maler]

Responding to myself: Regarding your opinions on the comments to the
document, of course, you could also just use the GDoc mechanism to actually
insert replies to the comments there instead -- duh. I encourage that.
Please do that ASAP, and that way we can have an asynchronous
"conversation" in the document and hopefully dispatch the comments quickly
at the start of the next call where we have consensus.


*Eve Maler*ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging Technology
Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
Join our ForgeRock.org OpenUMA <http://forgerock.org/openuma/> community!

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Eve Maler <eve.maler at forgerock.com> wrote:

> Completing my action item, you'll find our (well-worn :-) use case
> document here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IvbdWerdvMuA1dQ-KQvVKqIBrAas7FoenNVUtgpqYrw/edit?usp=sharing>.
> Following is my proposal. If we like what I've done here, I recommend that
> we:
>
>    - Edit the doc title to match the use case title I've supplied (just
>    below the horizontal line).
>
>
>    - Resolve all the comments above my title (fear not, they're all
>    accounted for in the comments I've inserted) and delete all the text above
>    that point (I've retained all our existing text above the line, just in
>    case).
>
>
>    - Resolve all the comments I've inserted -- as quickly as possible! We
>    don't have to take up call time to do the minor ones, if people take the
>    initiative to review them offline and supply their feedback as responses to
>    this note. Note that, in this new template, I have avoided the use of the
>    comment mechanism for anything that should be a permanent part of the
>    document.
>
>
>    - Ask people to write their other use cases in GDoc using this style.
>
>
>    - Obviously, if you have suggestions on how to improve the template,
>    weigh in! If you want to make invasive suggestions, contact me and we can
>    do a collaborative editing session together.
>
> I'm extremely glad I finally did this exercise, because it caused me to
> understand more of what we need to consider profiling and more of the
> "health SME" point of view. And, to be honest (perhaps forestalling a
> comment from Justin ;-), I don't feel that it was wasteful to go to this
> degree of mapping to the technologies because it flushed out some
> mismatches that really didn't make sense to me all this time. I now feel we
> can go straight to the heart (ahem) of the profiling matter with as many
> future use cases as we want, and in fact, we can begin profiling and write
> more use cases in parallel.
>
> Thanks to you all for letting me "get my OCD on".
>
>
> *Eve Maler*ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging
> Technology
> Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
> Join our ForgeRock.org OpenUMA <http://forgerock.org/openuma/> community!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-heart/attachments/20150801/0f15580c/attachment.html>