[Openid-specs-fapi] +1 on Plus

[Mike Schwartz]

Couldn't you say the same thing about "Connect"

Connect what?

- Mike

On 2018-05-16 05:36, Mike Jones wrote:
> Plus is a horrible name because it's meaningless.  Think about it.  If
> we chose "Plus", the first part of every conversation in which it is
> used would be to have to explain what it refers to, which everyone
> would likely do slightly differently.  We shouldn't put ourselves or
> those using the specs in that position.
> 
> 				-- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Openid-specs-fapi <openid-specs-fapi-bounces at lists.openid.net>
> On Behalf Of Mike Schwartz via Openid-specs-fapi
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 5:52 AM
> To: Financial API Working Group List 
> <openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net>
> Cc: Mike Schwartz <mike at gluu.org>
> Subject: [Openid-specs-fapi] +1 on Plus
> 
> As Nat points out, OpenID is implicit in all names. So "Plus" is ok I
> guess... we have "Connect", so it's not that different. "Plus" is
> generic, but I guess that's the point. And at least it's only four
> letters :-)
> 
> - Mike
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
> Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi