[Openid-specs-fapi] [Bitbucket] Issue #123: Is it okay for request object URNs to be predictable? (openid/fapi)

Dave Tonge issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Thu Sep 14 10:18:56 UTC 2017

Dave Tonge commented on issue #123:
Is it okay for request object URNs to be predictable?<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/123/is-it-okay-for-request-object-urns-to-be>

I think the wording should be tightened such that whether the redirect_uri is a url or urn it is based on a cryptographic random value.

View this issue<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/123/is-it-okay-for-request-object-urns-to-be> or add a comment by replying to this email.

Unsubscribe from issue emails<https://bitbucket.org/api/1.0/repositories/openid/fapi/issue/123/unsubscribe/openid/df2bfe7836723d6e685249a416e7c899130d4b87/> for this repository.               [Bitbucket]  <https://bitbucket.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-fapi/attachments/20170914/47a41e85/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Openid-specs-fapi mailing list