[Openid-specs-fapi] [Bitbucket] Pull request #39: Part 2: Improve wording around holder of key requirement (openid/fapi)

Joseph Heenan pullrequests-reply at bitbucket.org
Wed Oct 11 14:42:07 UTC 2017

Joseph Heenan created pull request #39:
Part 2: Improve wording around holder of key requirement<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/pull-requests/39/part-2-improve-wording-around-holder-of>

I had to read this clause about 3 times before figuring out exactly what the actual requirement was - I think this rewording makes the intent clearer.

I'm removed the words "for write operations" from the end of this clause, as it is within a section of clauses that all only apply to write operations.

Author  Commit  Message Date
[josephheenan] Joseph Heenan    99ea940<https://bitbucket.org/josephheenan/fapi/commits/99ea94076d5bf763b76e0a5f4e4557ded986beac>       Part 2: Improve wording around authorization code, access token, and
11 Oct 2017

View this pull request<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/pull-requests/39/part-2-improve-wording-around-holder-of> or add a comment by replying to this email.

Unsubscribe from pull request emails<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/pull-requests/39/unsubscribe/openid/5e2ab6c925aa29784b5c1bcdadc3c53811557d4d/> for this repository.              [Bitbucket]  <https://bitbucket.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-fapi/attachments/20171011/36ebdd25/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Openid-specs-fapi mailing list