From fett at danielfett.de Mon Nov 22 10:50:44 2021 From: fett at danielfett.de (Daniel Fett) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:50:44 +0100 Subject: [OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Invitation to participate in the eKYC Interop Testing Event In-Reply-To: <056eb375-c50d-34ee-946e-39a1eec868c7@danielfett.de> References: <056eb375-c50d-34ee-946e-39a1eec868c7@danielfett.de> Message-ID: <40d35c0b-7e81-d79c-3d42-9de6b7897104@danielfett.de> Hi all, if you want to participate in the Interop Testing event, please add your details to the document linked below, thanks! -Daniel Am 16.11.21 um 09:12 schrieb Daniel Fett via Openid-specs-ekyc-ida: > > Hi all, > > I would like to invite all implementers of the eKYC specification to > participate in the eKYC Interop Testing event next week and the week > after. > > The aim of the eKYC Interop Testing Event is to bring implementers of > OpenID Connect for Identity Assurance - relying parties and identity > providers - together to gather experience regarding real-world > interoperability of their implementations. One cornerstone of the > testing will be the official eKYC test suite provided by the OpenID > Foundation. > > *Schedule* > > * 2021-11-22: > o Implementers confirm their participation > o Implementers provide access data in this document > o Start of interoperability testing > + Implementers in the RP role test against available IDP > implementations > + IDPs test against the eKYC test suite > + All implementers provide support to other participants if > required > * 2021-11-29 15:00 UTC: > o Welcome Call, introduction of participants, clarification of > first technical questions > * 2021-11-30 16:00 UTC (Embedded into the OAuth Security Workshop): > o Presentation of results > + Results of RP-IDP interoperability tests (matrix) > + eKYC test suite results > + Lessons learned: Incompatibilities, implementation errors, > etc. > > If you would like to participate, please add details of your testing > environment to this document: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DT3SOdnaye_PK9qhM1CUG5LYqWUpcgPqTQ9LY5IzDd0/edit#heading=h.ixsqgqdjf0hm > > > -Daniel > > > -- > https://danielfett.de > -- https://danielfett.de -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From issues-reply at bitbucket.org Tue Nov 23 11:37:45 2021 From: issues-reply at bitbucket.org (josephheenan) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 11:37:45 +0000 Subject: [OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Issue #1264: formatting issues in ID3 (openid/ekyc-ida) Message-ID: <01FN69CT5CXYF9DHCEY84SHK79@bitbucket.org> New issue 1264: formatting issues in ID3 https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1264/formatting-issues-in-id3 Joseph Heenan: [https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-4-identity-assurance-1\_0-ID3.html#name-op-metadata](https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-4-identity-assurance-1_0-ID3.html#name-op-metadata) seems to contain some typographical issues: 1. `see @!predefined_values` was presumably intended to become a hyperlink to somewhere 2. the `_` in \`electronic\_record\` has vanished \(or rather, has been interpreted as a request to apply italic until the `_` in predefined\_values\) ? ? ![](https://bitbucket.org/repo/nkyb7qg/images/4234450798-Screenshot%202021-11-23%20at%2011.33.14.png) ? From issues-reply at bitbucket.org Wed Nov 24 11:07:46 2021 From: issues-reply at bitbucket.org (josephheenan) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:07:46 +0000 Subject: [OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Issue #1265: OP metadata should indicate if empty arrays are okay or not (openid/ekyc-ida) Message-ID: <01FN8T2MBRRQ3CWZV6FR4BZDYE@bitbucket.org> New issue 1265: OP metadata should indicate if empty arrays are okay or not https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1265/op-metadata-should-indicate-if-empty Joseph Heenan: In [https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-4-identity-assurance-1\_0-ID3.html#name-op-metadata](https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-4-identity-assurance-1_0-ID3.html#name-op-metadata) some entries contain ?This array must have at least one member.? and some contain ?This array may have zero or more members.?, but e.g. `electronic_records` does not, and I presume falls into the ?at least one member? case, as do the other arrays that don?t explicitly refer to the allowed number of elements. From mark at considrd.consulting Wed Nov 24 11:43:41 2021 From: mark at considrd.consulting (Mark Haine) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:43:41 +0000 Subject: [OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Proposed eKYC and IDA WG Agenda for 24-11-2021 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi All, Here is the suggested agenda for today?s WG: 1. Brief review of external Orgs & Events OSW 2021 Any others to mention? 1. Main Agenda Items Conformance ? Issue #1199 ? Joseph, Mark and Daniel AOB 1. PRs & Issues Review PRs #86 ? transformed claims maxdepth ? Mark #87 ? verifier to validation ? Jules #88 & #89 ? Markdown fixes ? Taka #90 ? age_18_or_over - Daniel Review Issues New #1265 - empty arrays are okay or not ? Joseph #1264 ? formatting issues - Joseph Ready for close Active #1262 ? Fix msisdn example ? Vladimir/Bjorn #1233 - Pending Verification ? new owner needed #1261 - use of JSON ?null? in request ? Joseph Any others of interest Mark +44 (0) 777 555 0344 | mark at considrd.consulting | considrd.consulting | 30 The Grange, Irvine. KA11 2EU [considrd.consulting logo][OpenID Logo] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 22173 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 8480 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: