[OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Issue #1251: How to express when claims are/were valid when there is more than one verified claim (openid/ekyc-ida)

Julian White issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Wed Jul 28 12:55:29 UTC 2021


New issue 1251: How to express when claims are/were valid when there is more than one verified claim
https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1251/how-to-express-when-claims-are-were-valid

Julian White:

Its not clear how to express when a claim was valid when claims change over time, e.g. when someone changed their address or name. The current specification seems to assume that only current details are sent. Many AML processes will often need some historical data for KYC purposes, especially if the details have changed recently.

It would be useful have a start and end date. Both can be optional. Where a start date is missing then it means its probably true from birth, when the end date is missing its still current. Addresses tend to be more fluid so it would also be useful to have dates for those that are separate from the name claims. For example:

‌

```json
"claims": {
  "given_name": "Max",
  "family_name": "Meier",
  "date_from": "2016-12-22",
  "birthdate": "1956-01-28",
  "place_of_birth": {
    "country": "DE",
    "locality": "Musterstadt"
  },
  "nationalities": [
    "DE"
  ],
  "address": {
    "date_until": "2020-06-02",
    "locality": "Maxstadt",
    "postal_code": "12344",
    "country": "DE",
    "street_address": "An der Weide 22"
  },
}
```

‌



More information about the Openid-specs-ekyc-ida mailing list