From sakimura at gmail.com Wed Jun 3 03:23:30 2009 From: sakimura at gmail.com (Nat Sakimura) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:23:30 +0900 Subject: [Specs-cx] NRI Contribution Agreement Message-ID: --0016e64ec8fc0a9437046b6f0d26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I did not see my contribution agreement on the OIDF web so I am posting it here as a proof. It would probably have to be counter singed by Don, but to me, this form is mysterious. Just unilateral contribution should work... Anyways, Cheers, -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ --0016e64ec8fc0a9437046b6f0d26 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="NRI-Contribution-Agreement-CX.pdf" X-Attachment-Id: f_fvhw263e0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NRI-Contribution-Agreement-CX.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 152860 bytes Desc: not available URL: --0016e64ec8fc0a9437046b6f0d26-- From hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp Thu Jun 4 23:53:53 2009 From: hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp (nara hideki) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:53:53 +0900 Subject: [Specs-cx] my contribution agreement Message-ID: --0015174c0fa80ccc2e046b945b63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all =hdknr has provided my contribution agreement on my pubic repository. URL is here: http://code.hdknr.com/OpenID/contribution-agreement-cx.pdf Please tell me if there is something wrong with that. Thanks. ----- http://xri.net/=hdknr/(+resume) --0015174c0fa80ccc2e046b945b63 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all

=hdknr has provided my contribution agreement on my pubic repository.

URL is here:
http://code.hdknr.com/OpenID/contribution-agreement-cx.pdf

Please tell me if there is something wrong with that.

Thanks.
-----
http://xri.net/=hdknr/(+resume)
--0015174c0fa80ccc2e046b945b63-- From david.garcia at tractis.com Fri Jun 5 02:45:02 2009 From: david.garcia at tractis.com (David Garcia) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:45:02 +0200 Subject: [Specs-cx] Contribution Agreement to for CX scpecs list Message-ID: <7d9a3d920906050245s1a1a47d1o68cbe54a61c2bd5a@mail.gmail.com> --001e6837894720f97d046b96bfd4 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e6837894720f95e046b96bfd2 --001e6837894720f95e046b96bfd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, My name's Dave Garcia CTO at Tractis.com . I'm submitting the agreement. Hope all needed data is filled but is something is missing or wrong please contact me and I'll fix it at the moment. In an additional way I want to offer the service that my company is offering (online contracts) for free with no limit for this comitee If you want to make this process faster allowing online agreement signing on our site. Best regards Dave Garcia -- David Garcia CTO Tractis - Online contracts you can enforce http://www.tractis.com -- Tel: (34) 93 551 96 60 (ext. 260) Email: david.garcia at tractis.com Blog: http://blog.negonation.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/tractis --001e6837894720f95e046b96bfd2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

My name's Dave Garcia CTO at Tractis.com . I'm submittin= g the agreement. Hope all needed data is filled but is something is missing= or wrong please contact me and I'll fix it at the moment.

In an= additional way I want to offer the service that my company is offering (on= line contracts) for free with no limit for this comitee If you want to make= this process faster allowing online agreement signing on our site.
=A0
Best regards

Dave Garcia

--
David Garc= ia
CTO

Tractis - Online contracts you can enforce
http://www.tractis.com
--
Tel: (34) 93 551= 96 60 (ext. 260)

Email: david.garcia at tractis= .com
Blog: http://blog.negona= tion.com
Twitter: http://twit= ter.com/tractis
--001e6837894720f95e046b96bfd2-- --001e6837894720f97d046b96bfd4 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc" X-Attachment-Id: f_fvkpkds00 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc Type: application/msword Size: 128512 bytes Desc: not available URL: --001e6837894720f97d046b96bfd4-- From sakimura at gmail.com Mon Jun 8 03:50:57 2009 From: sakimura at gmail.com (Nat Sakimura) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:50:57 +0900 Subject: [Specs-cx] Intro. to the concept behind CX Message-ID: --0016361e88c65e8cd4046bd404a6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =3Dhdknr is busily preparing the initial document for the current thought n= ow (which is going to be submit around Wednesday), but I will start introducin= g concept here little by little. (I thought of using wiki.openid.net but I di= d not know whether I can control the edits so that we do not get exposed to IPR pollution, so I am doing it here.) The main concept of the Contract Exchange is to exchange the public key signed contract among =93parties=94. Basic model calls for two parties, wit= h two additional signatories. Under current situation, Signatories are typically servers/services. There will be a contract proposal (offer) on the table to start with. It is signed by the Offerer. The signature achieves two things: 1) Non-repudiation: The offerer really made the offer. 2) Integrity: The accepting party cannot change the offer. Once the accepting party reads the offer and agrees to it, the contract is established, and to signify it, the accepting party will counter-sign the document. That=92s all what it does. It could subsequently be used as a token to obtain further data or service, i.e., just like an Access Token of OAuth. The protocol that we have been talking at various venues (such as IIW) is actually very simple. It is almost a simplified version of OAuth with a bit of tweaks. So, now you understand: There are two important parts in CX. 1) Contract Format 2) Protocol to exchange signed contract. Of the two, 2) is actually easier, as I mentioned above. In the following posts, I will talk about each. --=20 Nat Sakimura (=3Dnat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ --0016361e88c65e8cd4046bd404a6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=3Dhdknr is busily preparing the initial document for the current thought now (which is going to be submit around Wednesday), but I will start introducing concept here little by little. (I thought of using wiki.openid.net but I did not know w= hether I can control the edits so that we do not get exposed to IPR pollution, so I am doing it here.)

The main concept of the Contract Exchange is to exchange the public key signed contract among =93parties=94. Basic model calls for two parties, with two additional signatories. Under current situation, Signatories are typically servers/services.

There will be a contract proposal (offer) on the table to start with. It is signed by the Offerer. The signature achieves two things:

1) Non-repudiation: The offerer really made the offer.
2) Integrity: The accepting party cannot change the offer.

Once the accepting party reads the offer and agrees to it, the contract is established, and to signify it, the accepting party will counter-sign the document.

That=92s all what it does.
It could subsequently be used as a token to obtain further data or service,= i.e., just like an Access Token of OAuth.

The protocol that we have been talking at various venues (such as IIW) is actually very simple. It is almost a simplified version of OAuth with a bit= of=A0 tweaks.

So, now you understand: There are two important parts in CX.

1) Contract Format
2) Protocol to exchange signed contract.

Of the two, 2) is actually easier, as I mentioned above.

In the following posts, I will talk about each.



--
Nat Sakimura (=3Dnat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
--0016361e88c65e8cd4046bd404a6-- From diana.r.almeida at gmail.com Thu Jun 25 07:12:49 2009 From: diana.r.almeida at gmail.com (Diana Almeida) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:12:49 +0100 Subject: [Specs-cx] [specs-cx] My contribution agreement Message-ID: <4A4385E1.9030208@dcc.fc.up.pt> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030902090900020304090002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello all :) In attachment i send my contribution agreement. I had already send it to Nat and Don but i forgot to send it to the list, sorry. Please let me know if something isn't wright. Thanks, Diana --------------030902090900020304090002 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Diana_Almeida_ContributionAgreement.pdf" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Diana_Almeida_ContributionAgreement.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1054858 bytes Desc: not available URL: --------------030902090900020304090002-- From sakimura at gmail.com Wed Jun 3 10:23:30 2009 From: sakimura at gmail.com (Nat Sakimura) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:23:30 +0900 Subject: [Specs-cx] NRI Contribution Agreement Message-ID: I did not see my contribution agreement on the OIDF web so I am posting it here as a proof. It would probably have to be counter singed by Don, but to me, this form is mysterious. Just unilateral contribution should work... Anyways, Cheers, -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NRI-Contribution-Agreement-CX.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 152860 bytes Desc: not available URL: From hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp Fri Jun 5 06:53:53 2009 From: hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp (nara hideki) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:53:53 +0900 Subject: [Specs-cx] my contribution agreement Message-ID: Dear all =hdknr has provided my contribution agreement on my pubic repository. URL is here: http://code.hdknr.com/OpenID/contribution-agreement-cx.pdf Please tell me if there is something wrong with that. Thanks. ----- http://xri.net/=hdknr/(+resume) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From david.garcia at tractis.com Fri Jun 5 09:45:02 2009 From: david.garcia at tractis.com (David Garcia) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:45:02 +0200 Subject: [Specs-cx] Contribution Agreement to for CX scpecs list Message-ID: <7d9a3d920906050245s1a1a47d1o68cbe54a61c2bd5a@mail.gmail.com> Hi, My name's Dave Garcia CTO at Tractis.com . I'm submitting the agreement. Hope all needed data is filled but is something is missing or wrong please contact me and I'll fix it at the moment. In an additional way I want to offer the service that my company is offering (online contracts) for free with no limit for this comitee If you want to make this process faster allowing online agreement signing on our site. Best regards Dave Garcia -- David Garcia CTO Tractis - Online contracts you can enforce http://www.tractis.com -- Tel: (34) 93 551 96 60 (ext. 260) Email: david.garcia at tractis.com Blog: http://blog.negonation.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/tractis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc Type: application/msword Size: 128512 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sakimura at gmail.com Mon Jun 8 10:50:57 2009 From: sakimura at gmail.com (Nat Sakimura) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:50:57 +0900 Subject: [Specs-cx] Intro. to the concept behind CX Message-ID: =hdknr is busily preparing the initial document for the current thought now (which is going to be submit around Wednesday), but I will start introducing concept here little by little. (I thought of using wiki.openid.net but I did not know whether I can control the edits so that we do not get exposed to IPR pollution, so I am doing it here.) The main concept of the Contract Exchange is to exchange the public key signed contract among ?parties?. Basic model calls for two parties, with two additional signatories. Under current situation, Signatories are typically servers/services. There will be a contract proposal (offer) on the table to start with. It is signed by the Offerer. The signature achieves two things: 1) Non-repudiation: The offerer really made the offer. 2) Integrity: The accepting party cannot change the offer. Once the accepting party reads the offer and agrees to it, the contract is established, and to signify it, the accepting party will counter-sign the document. That?s all what it does. It could subsequently be used as a token to obtain further data or service, i.e., just like an Access Token of OAuth. The protocol that we have been talking at various venues (such as IIW) is actually very simple. It is almost a simplified version of OAuth with a bit of tweaks. So, now you understand: There are two important parts in CX. 1) Contract Format 2) Protocol to exchange signed contract. Of the two, 2) is actually easier, as I mentioned above. In the following posts, I will talk about each. -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From diana.r.almeida at gmail.com Thu Jun 25 14:12:49 2009 From: diana.r.almeida at gmail.com (Diana Almeida) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:12:49 +0100 Subject: [Specs-cx] [specs-cx] My contribution agreement Message-ID: <4A4385E1.9030208@dcc.fc.up.pt> Hello all :) In attachment i send my contribution agreement. I had already send it to Nat and Don but i forgot to send it to the list, sorry. Please let me know if something isn't wright. Thanks, Diana -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Diana_Almeida_ContributionAgreement.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 1054858 bytes Desc: not available URL: