[OIDFSC] Specifications Council action required
Michael.Jones at microsoft.com
Wed May 26 00:02:50 UTC 2010
Yes, it's in the OpenID IPR Process document, which can be found at http://openid.net/intellectual-property/. See Sections 4.1 and 4.2.
From: openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net [mailto:openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Johnny Bufu
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 4:31 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: David Recordon; openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net; Brian Kissel; Don Thibeau
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Specifications Council action required
Thanks Mike, it looks like I misunderstood this part of the process. Is it captured in a document that can be used as reference?
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:21:20PM +0000, Mike Jones wrote:
> Actually, proposals are supposed to be sent to the specs list. The specs-council list is for the council to discuss proposals, and while it's fine for proposers to cc the specs-council list, the council should also consider the proposals that were only sent to the specs list.
> -- Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net [mailto:openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Johnny Bufu
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 12:19 AM
> To: David Recordon
> Cc: Brian Kissel; openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net; Don Thibeau
> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Specifications Council action required
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:53:42PM -0600, David Recordon wrote:
> > There are a variety of Work Group proposals waiting on the Specifications
> > Council which have been posted to the specs@ list per the IPR process.
> OpenID v.Next Discovery is the only one I've seen on the specs-council@ mailing
> list, which to my knowledge is the correct one for addressing the council
> for working group formation, also per:
More information about the specs-council