<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I don't distinguish claims in the registration request and in the
software statement. It's just a different "container".<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 12.08.2015 um 20:32 schrieb George
Fletcher:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55CB913F.5010102@aol.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">If these are claims the
RP is entitled to receive, how does the AS verify that claim?
Shouldn't that data be in the Software Statement rather than in
the client reg parameters? I'm probably missing something :)<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
George<br>
</font><br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/12/15 2:19 PM, Torsten
Lodderstedt wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55CB8E3C.9020106@lodderstedt.net"
type="cite">good point. I would assume this is the list of
claims the RP is entitled to get access to. I think it doesn't
matter whether the RP asks for the claim via scopes or claims
parameter. <br>
<br>
Entitlement is given by the authority, which issued the software
statement, the RP wants to register with. <br>
<br>
Am 12.08.2015 um 01:07 schrieb John Bradley: <br>
<blockquote type="cite">So these wold be default claims, or a
filter that prevents more than the listed claims from coming
back. <br>
<br>
How do you see this interacting with scopes? <br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Aug 11, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Torsten
Lodderstedt <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:torsten@lodderstedt.net"><torsten@lodderstedt.net></a>
wrote: <br>
<br>
Hi Mike, <br>
<br>
as you are in the process of producing eratas of the OIDC
specs, I would like to raise a question regarding client
registration we came up with in the MODRNA WG. Right now,
the RP may restrict itself to certain grant and response
types. We see the need to do the same for claims. Would you
consider it a reasonable enhancement of the Client
Registration spec to add something like "claims" to the
registration spec? I consider it complementary to
"claims_supported" as specified in the discovery spec. <br>
<br>
kind regards, <br>
Torsten. <br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
Openid-specs-ab mailing list <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net</a>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
Openid-specs-ab mailing list <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net</a>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab</a>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://connect.me/gffletch"
title="View full card on Connect.Me"><img
moz-do-not-send="true"
src="cid:part1.09020401.04090500@aol.com" alt="George
Fletcher" height="113" width="359"></a></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>