<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Spec call notes 14-Nov-11<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Jones<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nat Sakimura<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Edmund Jay<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">John Bradley<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Agenda:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> JOSE and IETF Update<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Editing Status<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Open Issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Implementer's Draft Next Steps<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Google/Verizon/ID DataWeb pilot announcement<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">JOSE and IETF Update:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> JOSE accepted JWS, JWE, JWK as working group documents<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike appointed by chairs as editor<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Chairs requested to shorten author list - Move some authors to Contributing Authors section<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Chairs requested terminology change: Signature -> Integrity<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> There uses of HMAC to tell who sent it - not just integrity<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> WG requested using short names for JWK since keys appear in ECDH ephemeral public keys<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Editing Status:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike did global edits, closed many issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike still has a small set of edits to perform<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Will do the spelling/grammar check before SVN checkin<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Open Issues:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #286: Discovery 3.4 - Simple Web Discovery endpoint unreachable fallback dangerous<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> John said that some IdPs may want to work without doing per-user discovery<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> John may file a tracking bug for this feature to consider post ID<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Agreed to remove - Mike<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #284: Access Token needs to include an audience of the Resource Server (Normative)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> John thinks that we may want to specify what an interoperable access token is<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> But not necessary at this time<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> John will send a note to the OAuth list about what an audience restriction does and does not do<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Agreement that Access Token should contain an audience restriction - Mike<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #281: Obtaining claims without requiring additional round trips<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Hold - Mike will continue trying to determine what mechanism is desired<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #232: Client sends a request to the Authorization Server (Editorial)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat will do within next day<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #133: Basic - 3.1. What is conversion? What benefit comes if it will be increased?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike will use language from Standard in Basic<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike will still file issues based upon Yaron Goland's comments<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Implementer's Draft Next Steps:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Take snapshot of updated draft-jones-json-web-* drafts<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Plan to announce Implementer's Drafts by Japan summit<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Google/Verizon/ID DataWeb pilot announcement<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Verizon is at level 3 (but hasn't officially announced this yet)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> A lot of interest in OpenID Connect<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Not using the mechanism in Connect for Distributed Claims<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> They may move to it once Connect is finished<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> They have speced an OAuth-based protocol to register a remote resource with an authorization server<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We should look at that<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> UMA-like but not exactly UMA<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>