[Openid-specs-ab] I'm planning to start applying errata edits to OpenID Connect

Mike Jones Michael.Jones at microsoft.com
Sun Jul 26 20:24:46 UTC 2015

I understand wanting to do these, but neither of them seem like errata actions.  Although I believe that people can actually do both of these now without a change to the specs.

                                                            -- Mike

From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:sakimura at gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 1:06 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] I'm planning to start applying errata edits to OpenID Connect

I will add a couple of them, which could be of a longer term:

- support for PKCE.
- making ECDSA required in self-issued.

On Friday, July 24, 2015, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>> wrote:
I wanted to let you know that I plan to start applying errata edits to the OpenID Connect specifications.  These edits will include:

•        Referencing the JOSE, JWT, OAuth Assertions, and acct URI RFCs instead of working group drafts

•        Registering the Connect-specific Dynamic Registration metadata values in the registry established by RFC 7591

•        Removing the warning about the Google “iss” value currently in Section 15.6.2

•        Addressing typos described in the issue tracker

If you know of other issues that we need to address as errata, please add them to the issue tracker at https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fbitbucket.org%2fopenid%2fconnect%2fissues%3fstatus%3dnew%26status%3dopen&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7cb769f9e6a15d4732d09008d295f5929f%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=WSEaNmVLoqZFZKsuyeiBde5g90vXN60B77FfYD0zTkY%3d> using the milestone “Errata”.

Note that I’ll first publish the updated drafts to http://openid.bitbucket.org/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fopenid.bitbucket.org%2f&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7cb769f9e6a15d4732d09008d295f5929f%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=n1%2blWnTIvpLotiHf5g432w34yP56%2f0jdGfbAHA0JbCo%3d> for review.  Also, I think we should wait until draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2ftools.ietf.org%2fhtml%2fdraft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-08&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7cb769f9e6a15d4732d09008d295f5929f%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=i15mIO0%2fihxYvbdQngkxCqSECWRz6oaz1w9wE1zoojg%3d> exits the RFC Editor queue and becomes an RFC before we call this second errata round done.

                                                            -- Mike

Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20150726/fc8585da/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list