[Openid-specs-ab] claims to scope mapping

John Bradley ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com
Wed Dec 18 22:44:31 UTC 2013


In principal it is not a bad idea.  We don't have a working group document for that sort of extension at this point.

We are trying to get the base specs out before getting too distracted with extending it.

John B.

On Dec 18, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Michael Schwartz <mike at gluu.org> wrote:

> OpenID Connect Gurus,
> 
> I never got an answer about whether it would be ok to include optional scope-to-claims mapping to enhance discovery. If a domain defines custom scopes, and custom claims, it would make sense to publish this information via discovery...
> 
> thx,
> 
> Mike
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4507 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20131218/d44acaf0/attachment.p7s>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list