[Openid-specs-ab] FW: [apps-discuss] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-02
jricher at mitre.org
Wed Jan 30 15:34:31 UTC 2013
What impact, if any, would this have on the user experience? As long as
a user can still type user at domain.com and the system has a deterministic
way of normalizing that to something, I think it's immaterial whether or
not the acct: scheme gets used in the back end.
On 01/29/2013 01:41 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> OpenID Connect is now using the acct: scheme, so it's important for us to weigh in on its standardization. Please take a moment and reply to the last call message below, either expressing your support for the document going to the IESG (I did) or describing objections you may have. If you're not a member of the apps-discuss list, you can join at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss.
> -- Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Salvatore Loreto
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 5:25 AM
> To: apps-discuss at ietf.org
> Subject: [apps-discuss] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-02
> Dear WG partecipants,
> I would like to initiate a 2 weeks WG Last Call on draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-02.txt ("The 'acct' URI Scheme") http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-02.txt
> Please send your reviews, as well as expression of support regarding document readiness for IESG (or not) either to the *apps-discuss* mailing list, or directly to the WG chairs (Murray Kucherawy and myself).
> The WG LC will end on Friday, February 8th.
> Thank you,
> Salvatore as an APPSAWG co-chair.
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss at ietf.org
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
More information about the Openid-specs-ab