[Openid-specs-ab] Agenda addition for today's call

Nat Sakimura sakimura at gmail.com
Mon Jun 20 17:59:12 UTC 2011


Agreed.

For OpenID 2.0 Migration, old Artifact Binding draft had them.
Perhaps I can extract them into a stand alone doc. unless somebody else has
written it.

As a matter of fact, Artifact Binding also had dynamic registration.

=nat

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>wrote:

>  Thanks Nat.  I’d add to this list:****
>
> ** **
>
> - IdP Discovery****
>
> - OpenID 2.0 Migration****
>
> ** **
>
>                                                                 Thanks,***
> *
>
>                                                                 -- Mike***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net [mailto:
> openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] *On Behalf Of *Nat Sakimura
> *Sent:* Monday, June 20, 2011 10:52 AM
> *To:* openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> *Subject:* [Openid-specs-ab] Agenda addition for today's call****
>
> ** **
>
> I would like to propose the following for today's spec call. ****
>
> ** **
>
> 1. Status check of each sub-specs. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Report from each sub-spec editors. ****
>
> ** **
>
> - Core****
>
> - UserInfo****
>
> - Session****
>
> - JWE****
>
> - Bindings****
>
> ** **
>
> 2. Whether or not to add non-normative text for Bindings****
>
> ** **
>
> Currently, we have very little non-normative text in the Bindings and the
> reader has to go refer the Core and OAuth spec very often. ****
>
> Perhaps including some non-normative text instead of just referencing would
> improve the readability. ****
>
> ** **
>
> 3. Whether or not to merge Code Binding and Artifact Binding****
>
> ** **
>
> In fact, the are only a few lines of difference now. Perhaps can we merge
> them together? ****
>
> ** **
>
> 4. Separating out the session spec? ****
>
> ** **
>
> Right now, session spec is included in the core. A while ago, there seems
> to have been some talk around separating it out again. ****
>
> I would like to close on this.
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
> http://twitter.com/_nat_en****
>



-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
http://twitter.com/_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20110621/41b3fcd3/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list