[Openid-specs-ab] Please get me any feed back by Monday

Ryo Ito ritou.06 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 5 17:23:45 UTC 2010

Hi , Nat

When RP included invalid code in "direct_assertion_req"(8.5),
How does OP return the Negative Assertion(8.6)?
Should OP describe that code is invalid in "mode" parameter?


2010/6/4 Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com>:
> Hi.
> I got several feedback on Draft 9 off list. I incorporated them in Draft
> 10.
> If you have any feedback to the current draft10, please get it to me by
> Monday.
> I will try to incorporate them all. Once that is done, I will call it as the
> final for the public review.
> If there was no feedback, I take it as consent.
> NEXT STEP: Public Review
> According to my research(*1) , there are two options that we have right
> now:
> 1. Do it as Implementor's Draft (45 days)
> 2. Do it as Final Draft (60 days)
> I was originally planning to do it as 1., but we now seem to have Option 2.
> as well.
> There has never been a OpenID Spec that went through 1., so we might just as
> well do 2.
> Please indicate your preference as well.
> (*1) Clarification from Mike Jones. PAPE spec was finalized skipping the
> Implementor's draft. David R. stated opposition, but the vote went and it
> was accepted, so I presume this interpretation
> prevails. http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-pape/2008-December/000491.html
> From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>
> Date: December 22, 2008 11:51:07 AM PST
> To: "david at sixapart.com" <david at sixapart.com>
> Cc: "specs-pape at openid.net" <specs-pape at openid.net>, Paul Madsen
> <paulmadsen at rogers.com>
> Subject: RE: [specs-pape] Feedback on PAPE 1.0 Draft 7
> Just as the passage you quoted says, working groups may recommend approval
> of any of the three types of specs:  Implementer’s Draft, Final
> Specification, or Errata.  It’s the working group’s choice whether to
> release a draft as an implementer’s draft – explicitly planning for another
> round of revision after implementation feedback, or a final draft, requiring
> revision only if feedback during the 60 days (including from implementations
> that occur during the 60 days).  This working group has produced a final
> specification and recommended approval and the approval vote should commence
> today.
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
> http://twitter.com/_nat_en
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

Ryo Ito
Email : ritou.06 at gmail.com

More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list