[Openid-specs-ab] user consent

[Tim Cappalli]

The wallet and/or holder governs which claims are disclosed in the VP/VC. I don't see why any consent would apply at the ID token layer when carrying a VP.
________________________________
From: Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Tom Jones via Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 12:32
To: Artifact Binding/Connect Working Group <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
Cc: Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones at gmail.com>
Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] user consent

Before we talk any more about opaque blobs being added to the id token, I would like to talk about user consent. What little i have heard from the PE group the RP gets to ask for whatever info he wants and consent magically happens at some other level. Since the creds group of DIF is not discussing the problem I guess it must come up here. If the request/response of the VC/VP protocol is not known to the open id protocol, how can anybody know if the user has given informed consent to the release of the claims? As far as I can tell DIF is punting the issue altogether. (That comes from Daniel @ MSFT)

First - in SIOP user explicit consent MUST be obtained.
Second - in SIOP the data request from the RP (claims) must be presented to the user in a form they can understand before the id token (etc.) is created.

When we understand that we can talk about vc-xyz.

Be the change you want to see in the world ..tom
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20210408/ad1d3515/attachment.html>