[Openid-specs-ab] Spec Call Notes 26-Oct-20
Mike Jones
Michael.Jones at microsoft.com
Tue Oct 27 00:09:32 UTC 2020
Spec Call Notes 26-Oct-20
Mike Jones
Nat Sakimura
Tom Jones
Tobias Looker
Kristina Yasuda
Edmund Jay
Adam Lemmon
Tim Cappalli
Kim Cameron
Bjorn Hjelm
Self-Issued Identifier
prompt=create
Errata Status
Open Issues
Liaison Report
Nat asked about the W3C
WebAuthn L2 is review for CR
DIF
Kristina reported that Reuben finalized the text but hasn't signed it yet
Nat will touch base with Mike Leszcz about status
The DIF DID Auth work is paused
The DIF SIOP work is moving to the OpenID Foundation
Tom said that the DIF Identity Discovery (ID) WG is considering how to get control to wallets
OpenID Workshop
The OpenID Workshop is Wednesday, October 28th at 9am Pacific Time
https://openid.net/2020/09/14/openid-foundation-virtual-workshop-wednesday-october-28-2020/
Register now if you haven't already!
IIW
The second virtual IIW was last week
Tobias had a session on OpenID credential providers
Tobias is going to try to retrieve the recording
Kristina had a SIOP session
They talked about wallet invocation and the NASCAR problem
Sam Goto talked about WebID
Mike Jones gave an Introduction to OpenID Connect talk
The talk is posted at https://self-issued.info/?p=2130
Tobias saw lots of evidence of convergence among systems and people
Identity North
This will be at the same time as the OpenID Workshop
Nat recorded a recorded presentation
SIOP Discussions
Tobias summarized some of the recent SIOP discussions
He used a short deck to drive his talking points
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1mNkseYBxOs90whrgDonYyVZj3SqA2QGsn_pp-JpLapY/edit#slide=id.ga4548b7264_0_5
Among other topics, he discussed identifier portability between providers
Nat commented that the MODRNA WG has experience with identifier portability
Nat said that MODRNA provides account porting - not identifier portability
Mike said that this is like the OpenID 2.0 to OpenID Connect migration spec
Tobias said that subject types and subject identifiers might be used
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-secevent-subject-identifiers-06
Aggregated Claims Draft
Edmund reported that they're wanting additional reviewers
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/src/master/openid-connect-claims-aggregation/openid-connect-claims-aggregation-1_0.md
SIOP Requirements
Kristina asked whether any requirements should be removed
Nat said that we don't want to remove any requirements at this time
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/src/master/SIOP/siop-requirements.md
Nat asked Tobias if he had any requirements to add
Tobias suggested that we extend the protocol in a way that both SIOP and standard OPs can support
Mike said that claims providers should be usable by both kinds of providers
Kim said that SIOP is creating a user-in-the-middle scenario
With independent claims providers
Claims provision can be refactored
Nat said that we can decompose OPs into Identity Providers and Claims Providers
Next Call
The Pacific-friendly call is now weekly
The next call will be a week from now
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20201027/1a3808c9/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list