[Openid-specs-ab] Meeting notes for Pacific call (2020-11-16) is available

Torsten Lodderstedt torsten at lodderstedt.net
Tue Nov 17 17:56:04 UTC 2020


Please describe the issue wrt SIOP and OAuth 2.1

> Am 17.11.2020 um 18:52 schrieb Tom Jones via Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>:
> 
> what don't you understand?
> Peace ..tom
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:51 AM Torsten Lodderstedt via Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> I don’t understand this part:
> 
> "In all likelihood, we will continue referencing RFC6749 as there does not seem to be a good way to replace implicit flow in the case of SIOP.“
> 
> SIOP uses the „id_token“ response type, which is defined in https://openid.net/specs/oauth-v2-multiple-response-types-1_0.html not in RFC 6749. 
> 
> The OAuth 2.1. draft continues to support the „response_type“ parameter, so there is spec wise no problem to continue to define „id_token“ for SIOP.
> 
> best regards,
> Torsten. 
> 
> > Am 17.11.2020 um 01:29 schrieb Nat Sakimura via Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>:
> > 
> > Meeting notes for the pacific call is available now. 
> > 
> > https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/wiki/Connect_Meeting_Notes_2020-11-16_Pacific
> > 
> > Best, 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Nat Sakimura
> > NAT.Consulting LLC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> > Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab



More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list