[Openid-specs-ab] Meeting notes for Pacific call (2020-11-16) is available

Tom Jones thomasclinganjones at gmail.com
Tue Nov 17 17:52:57 UTC 2020


what don't you understand?
Peace ..tom


On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:51 AM Torsten Lodderstedt via Openid-specs-ab <
openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I don’t understand this part:
>
> "In all likelihood, we will continue referencing RFC6749 as there does not
> seem to be a good way to replace implicit flow in the case of SIOP.“
>
> SIOP uses the „id_token“ response type, which is defined in
> https://openid.net/specs/oauth-v2-multiple-response-types-1_0.html not in
> RFC 6749.
>
> The OAuth 2.1. draft continues to support the „response_type“ parameter,
> so there is spec wise no problem to continue to define „id_token“ for SIOP.
>
> best regards,
> Torsten.
>
> > Am 17.11.2020 um 01:29 schrieb Nat Sakimura via Openid-specs-ab <
> openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>:
> >
> > Meeting notes for the pacific call is available now.
> >
> >
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/wiki/Connect_Meeting_Notes_2020-11-16_Pacific
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > --
> > Nat Sakimura
> > NAT.Consulting LLC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> > Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20201117/3b53f23e/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list