[OpenID] OAuth SPs don't have to be your OpenID OP
sakimura at gmail.com
Sat Apr 4 05:58:27 UTC 2009
Right. And I think we are approaching a time that we should stop
thinking of an OP but Discovery provider, Authentication Provider, and
=nat at TOKYO via iPhone
On 2009/04/04, at 12:25, Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a simple request: please keep in mind that your OP doesn't have
> to be your OAuth SP as well.
> It seems that every time OAuth is mentioned, it's "OpenID+OAuth"
> where the OP is also your OAuth SP. Let's remember that unless
> every site that has something to offer becomes an OP, not every
> OAuth SP will be an OP. We should work to make the OAuth UX by
> itself seemless for the user as well, particularly if the user logs
> into both the consumer and the SP using the same OpenID.
> Andrew Arnott
> "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
> death your right to say it." - Voltaire
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
More information about the general