[OpenID] About Facebook, MySpace and OpenID

Breno de Medeiros breno at google.com
Sat Apr 4 00:15:00 UTC 2009

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:05 PM, SitG Admin
<sysadmin at shadowsinthegarden.com>wrote:

> If I were to read the spec on its own as an OP I would probably come to the
>> conclusion that what I need is an interface that shows the RP has requested:
>> 1. A set of information that is purely optional and they will provide
>> service even if the information is not provided.
>> 2. A set of information that the RP may restrict or deny service if I
>> don't provide.
> The point of overlap there is "restrict". RP's could provide some service
> if their key requirements are met, but additional (optional) attributes
> would be required to "unlock" other services. Since the RP would not deny
> service entirely if those additional attributes were withheld, it is not
> "required", but service will still be restricted if less than everything is
> available.
> For instance, a non-specialized Relying Party might provide E-mail alerts,
> SMS alerts, a dating service, a snail-mail proxy (mail is accepted for you
> at their address, then they redeliver it to your doorstep without exposing
> you to home invasion or snail spam), a $25 gift certificate useable at any
> of their allied stores but only as a birthday present - if you give them an
> E-mail address they will do #1, if you give them your phone number they will
> do #2, if you give them your full name they will do #3, if you give them
> your home address they will do #4, and if you give them your date of birth
> they will give you #5; there is no single attribute which MUST be present or
> the whole service is unavailable, but with none of that information they
> cannot give you anything.

An alternative view to this is that front-loading the user account creation
experience with requests to disclose a lot of information can lead to
sending the user away. A better approach is for incremental disclosure,
where requests for the user to disclose specific bits of information appear
in the context of the stated need.

An example of this was Plaxo's decision to not ask for OAuth tokens for
Picasa on Google account creation flow, and wait until the users show an
interest in the photo-sharing feature to give them that option (along with
Flick, etc.)

>  I let the user select or deselect any of there available attributes and
>> send back a positive response unless the user decides to cancel the login.
>> This includes not sending back required attributes.
> I strongly agree with this. OP's should not force an all-or-nothing
> response upon their users.
> -Shade
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general


+1 (650) 214-1007 desk
+1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central)
MTV-41-3 : 383-A
PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-general/attachments/20090403/aefe13f2/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the general mailing list