[OpenID] Wiki page: Attempting to document the "Email Address asOpenId" debate.
pbaker at verisign.com
Mon Feb 12 18:33:44 UTC 2007
The semantics of an identifier arise from its usage.
It is of course entirely possible that someone might configure their system in such a way that the Kerberos principal alice at example.com was different from the person with email address alice at example.com was different from the person with Jabber address alice at example.com.
But it is rather unlikely that the party who created this situation would be unaware of the potential for confusion.
If there is an OpenID identifier alice at example.com there may or may not be an SMTP server willing to accept mail for that address. If there is such a server the domain name owner should be expected to understand the consequences of the identifiers mapping to different principals and take whatever steps are felt necessary to ensure this.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: specs-bounces at openid.net
> [mailto:specs-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf Of David Fuelling
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:42 PM
> To: 'Claus Färber'
> Cc: specs at openid.net; general at openid.net
> Subject: RE: [OpenID] Wiki page: Attempting to document the
> "Email Address asOpenId" debate.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: general-bounces at openid.net
> [mailto:general-bounces at openid.net]
> > On Behalf Of Claus Färber
> >> http://openid.net/wiki/index.php?title=Debating_Emails_as_OpenIds
> > I'd prefer to call them user at REALM OpenIDs. The concept of
> using this
> > format is not only used for email but also for other types of
> > identifiers such as RADIUS zones or Kerberos realms.
> > For example, user at EXAMPLE.COM could be a RADIUS login, a Kerberos
> > principal and a Yadis ID/OpenID but not an email address.
> Hmmm....I'm not sure about this one. I intentionally rooted
> my definition of "Email Address" in RFC2822, which is where
> it should be rooted (if we're going to call them 'email
> addresses'). Seems like anything in the form 'user at domain'
> would also have an identical root (RFC2822).
> Is that not the case for Kerberos realms and RADIUS zones?
> In other words, are these *not* also email addresses?
> specs mailing list
> specs at openid.net
More information about the general