[OpenID] PR: OpenID.co.uk - "MobileNumber.OpenID.co.uk" as URI
gmartin at gmartin.org
Thu Feb 8 03:15:41 UTC 2007
Can't the same things be said of most identifiers in our lives?
Maybe I use a nickname for my openID. It could be meaningless to others,
but not me (and I would argue my phone number is not meaningless to me).
It certainly isn't unique and isn't permanently attached to me. Even my
name isn't permanently attached (at l east in the US you can pay to
Martin Atkins wrote:
> Mark Cross wrote:
>> Because if you take a mobile phone number it creates a 1-to-1 relationship,
>> there are intesting methods to verify you as the "user"of the phone. SMS and
>> incoming call line identification for example..
>> As mobile phone number is 1-to-1 there are no "dispute resolution" issues,
>> which plagues Nominet UK. (Our .co.uk top level domain authority.)
> * Telephone numbers are meaningless and unmemorable
> * Telephone numbers have an undesirable operation that can be performed
> on them: they can be used to make that thing in my pocket buzz and ring.
> * Phone numbers are not permanently attached to a person. While I've
> successfully maintained the same phone number for my entire
> mobile-phone-using life so far, I think I'm the only person I know who
> has managed that.
> If you wish to use a phone call or SMS message as a prerequisite for
> signing up — in similar vein to email verification — then fine, but I
> really don't like the idea of using telephone numbers as identifiers.
> general mailing list
> general at openid.net
More information about the general