<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Some questions (and moving this to the public list since it doesn't need to be private):<div><br></div><div> - The difference in definition of Sustaining Member and Community Member seems to be in Exhibit A (the dues schedule) though the qualification text seems identical in Section 3.1(b). This document structure seems awkward and confusing if you're not already familiar with how the Foundation has operated.</div><div> - In 3.1(c), why are we removing, "Each member shall have the right to vote on each matter submitted to a vote of the members of the corporation"?</div><div> - In 4.9 why are we removing the ability for action by written ballot on regular meetings and keeping it only for annual and special meetings?</div><div> - 5.2(b) says that, "The Community Members shall elect the number of directors (“Community Directors”. Given 3.1(b), wouldn't that mean that Sustaining Members are not eligible to vote for Community Directors?</div><div> - 5.15(b) has a comment asking if removal of a director by a 75% vote of the other directors should be limited to community directors. I do not believe that it should be limited.</div><div> - 5.15(c) used to provide a means for the Membership to remove any director. This has been changed to limit the Membership to only be able to remove community directors. As with my previous comment, I think that any extremely unlikely removal situation should be possible for all directors. Whether it is a person or a company, if 75% of the board votes to remove them or the Membership does, that ultimately places the Membership in control of the Foundation as I believe it should be.</div><div> - I don't think that 7.4(a) correctly represents the current makeup of the Executive Committee.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>--David</div><div><br></div><div></div></body></html>