<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 10/23/2008 08:41 PM, DeWitt Clinton:
<blockquote
cite="mid:5755edd90810231141r2a5f4197y5673917858831c53@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">And as commentary, I'll add that while I applaud the use
of the public board list, and wholeheartedly support its continued use
going forward, I find it incredibly unorthodox to unilaterally move an
in-progress vote to the public list, particularly one where the motion
is partially redacted and requires so much context, especially without
any prior discussion with the rest of the board about doing so.<br>
<br>
That said, I'm all for moving future online votes to the public list.
Let's just do that up front, rather than doing it unexpectedly midway
through.<br>
</blockquote>
The secrecy around this "deal" isn't really conforming for members of
OpenID. As a foundation, things should happen in the open or at least
include OIDF members. Otherwise it's hard to see the benefit of being a
member at all.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, <a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jabber: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Phone: </td>
<td>+1.213.341.0390</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>