[OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions

Brian Kissel bkissel at janrain.com
Sat Jan 17 16:41:14 UTC 2009


Yes, this is the discussion period.  The vote will start next Friday and be open for a week or until we have the required number of votes to approve or reject the motions.  If the motions get modified during the discussion period, I will upload the final versions into the voting tool.

Cheers,

Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502

From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:sakimura at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 10:05 PM
To: Brian Kissel
Cc: board at openid.net
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions

Well, actually, I do not think we need to wait.

This is the discussion period before the voting (1 week?).
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com<mailto:bkissel at janrain.com>> wrote:

OK, I will wait on putting any of the 4 proposals into the voting tool until the day before the election.  Please send me the final versions of each of your motions by next Thursday.



Cheers,

Brian

==============

Brian Kissel

Cell: 503.866.4424

Fax: 503.296.5502



From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:sakimura at gmail.com<mailto:sakimura at gmail.com>]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:57 PM

To: Brian Kissel
Cc: board at openid.net<mailto:board at openid.net>
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions



Yes.

The fourth one was modified as par discussion with David, though I also want to hear what other people feels like.

=nat

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com<mailto:bkissel at janrain.com>> wrote:

OK, so the first 3 were correct as stated?



Cheers,

Brian

==============

Brian Kissel

Cell: 503.866.4424

Fax: 503.296.5502



From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:sakimura at gmail.com<mailto:sakimura at gmail.com>]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:50 PM
To: Brian Kissel
Cc: board at openid.net<mailto:board at openid.net>

Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions



Yes. Preferably, not wiki (because it's a bit too easy to edit...) but something like bbs with voting facility :-)

Anyhow, here is my modified motion 4.

BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have agreed to amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft may claim OpenID trademark until it is ratified to be a specification.

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com<mailto:bkissel at janrain.com>> wrote:

Agreed, the wiki or something like it would be a better way to keep the proposal and discussion in one organized space. Nat, what do you think?

Cheers,

Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502


-----Original Message-----

From: board-bounces at openid.net<mailto:board-bounces at openid.net> [mailto:board-bounces at openid.net<mailto:board-bounces at openid.net>] On Behalf Of Chris Messina
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:43 PM
To: board at openid.net<mailto:board at openid.net>
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions

Would be great if Nat would add this to the wiki -- if only to try out
such a process and determine whether it works or not. I fear that
we're losing a lot of context/detail/accuracy by posting these kinds
of communications in multi-threaded emails.

Chris

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com<mailto:bkissel at janrain.com>> wrote:
> Nat, is there a more current version than this?  The actual text of your proposal, which I took from your email, was the text I was intending to put into the board polling tool.
>
> If there is a more current version, please send it to me.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
> ==============
> Brian Kissel
> Cell: 503.866.4424
> Fax: 503.296.5502
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: board-private-bounces at openid.net<mailto:board-private-bounces at openid.net> [mailto:board-private-bounces at openid.net<mailto:board-private-bounces at openid.net>] On Behalf Of David Recordon
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:36 PM
> To: board-private at openid.net<mailto:board-private at openid.net>
> Cc: board at openid.net<mailto:board at openid.net>
> Subject: Re: [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions
>
> Hey Brian,
> I don't believe this captures the latest motions that Nat made.
>
> --David
>
> On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Brian Kissel wrote:
>
>> When: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:00 AM-6:30 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific
>> Time (US & Canada).
>>
>> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
>>
>> FYI, this is a reminder that the online vote for Nat's four motions
>> will start on Friday Jan 23rd.
>>
>> Followings are the proposed motions that I would like the board to
>> consider. There are two types: one that can take effect immediately,
>> and one that requires board and membership voting.
>>
>> I. For immediate implementation of the current process:
>>
>> One of the obstacles that we have found during the process was that
>> it was kind of hard to get the specs council to deliver the
>> recommendation in a timely fashion. It has seen some improvement
>> recently, but we want to make sure to continue it. Thus, I would
>> like to propose the following:
>>
>> BE IT RESOLVED that the OIDF Committee Liason is directed to act as
>> the coordinator for the specification council so that specification
>> council create a recommendation for the membership about a formal
>> working group proposal within 15 days of the complete proposal being
>> circulated on specs at openid.net<mailto:specs at openid.net> to comply to the current OpenID
>> process.
>> II. Improvements of curent porcess
>>
>> As a longer term solution, I would like to propose the following
>> three motions. The first two are to make sure the timely and
>> effective response from the specs council, and the last one is to
>> protect the OpenID(TM) as well as to make it easier to create a WG
>> so that all the discussion will be done inside the WG and the output
>> is IPR clean.
>>
>> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
>> agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should the
>> specifications council not create a recommendation for the
>> membership about a formal working group proposal within 15 days of
>> the complete proposal being circulated on specs at openid.net<mailto:specs at openid.net>, then the
>> proposal may proceed to a membership vote for approval.
>> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
>> agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should specs
>> council members not participate in the discussion of two consecutive
>> working group proposals, they will be deemed to have resigned, and
>> new specs council members who are committed to participating in the
>> process will be appointed to replace them.
>> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
>> agreed to amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft
>> may claim OpenID trademark until it is ratified to be an
>> implementor's draft status or full specification status.
>>
>> <mime-attachment.ics>_______________________________________________
>> board-private mailing list
>> board-private at openid.net<mailto:board-private at openid.net>
>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private
>
> _______________________________________________
> board-private mailing list
> board-private at openid.net<mailto:board-private at openid.net>
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3772 (20090116) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3772 (20090116) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net<mailto:board at openid.net>
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>



--
Chris Messina
Citizen-Participant &
 Open Web Advocate-at-Large

factoryjoe.com<http://factoryjoe.com> # diso-project.org<http://diso-project.org>
citizenagency.com<http://citizenagency.com> # vidoop.com<http://vidoop.com>
This email is:   [ ] bloggable    [X] ask first   [ ] private
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
board at openid.net<mailto:board at openid.net>
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3772 (20090116) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3772 (20090116) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/



--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/



--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-board/attachments/20090117/1ce368a9/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the board mailing list