[OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions

Nat Sakimura sakimura at gmail.com
Sat Jan 17 05:56:47 UTC 2009


Yes.

The fourth one was modified as par discussion with David, though I also want
to hear what other people feels like.

=nat

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com> wrote:

>  OK, so the first 3 were correct as stated?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Brian
>
> *==============*
>
> *Brian Kissel*
>
> *Cell: 503.866.4424*
>
> *Fax: 503.296.5502*
>
>
>
> *From:* Nat Sakimura [mailto:sakimura at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2009 9:50 PM
> *To:* Brian Kissel
> *Cc:* board at openid.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on
> Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions
>
>
>
> Yes. Preferably, not wiki (because it's a bit too easy to edit...) but
> something like bbs with voting facility :-)
>
> Anyhow, here is my modified motion 4.
>
> *BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have agreed to
> amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft may claim OpenID
> trademark until it is ratified to be a specification.*
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com> wrote:
>
> Agreed, the wiki or something like it would be a better way to keep the
> proposal and discussion in one organized space. Nat, what do you think?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
> ==============
> Brian Kissel
> Cell: 503.866.4424
> Fax: 503.296.5502
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: board-bounces at openid.net [mailto:board-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf
> Of Chris Messina
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:43 PM
> To: board at openid.net
> Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on
> Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions
>
> Would be great if Nat would add this to the wiki -- if only to try out
> such a process and determine whether it works or not. I fear that
> we're losing a lot of context/detail/accuracy by posting these kinds
> of communications in multi-threaded emails.
>
> Chris
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com> wrote:
> > Nat, is there a more current version than this?  The actual text of your
> proposal, which I took from your email, was the text I was intending to put
> into the board polling tool.
> >
> > If there is a more current version, please send it to me.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Brian
> > ==============
> > Brian Kissel
> > Cell: 503.866.4424
> > Fax: 503.296.5502
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: board-private-bounces at openid.net [mailto:
> board-private-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf Of David Recordon
> > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:36 PM
> > To: board-private at openid.net
> > Cc: board at openid.net
> > Subject: Re: [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec
> process improvement motions
> >
> > Hey Brian,
> > I don't believe this captures the latest motions that Nat made.
> >
> > --David
> >
> > On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Brian Kissel wrote:
> >
> >> When: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:00 AM-6:30 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific
> >> Time (US & Canada).
> >>
> >> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >>
> >> FYI, this is a reminder that the online vote for Nat's four motions
> >> will start on Friday Jan 23rd.
> >>
> >> Followings are the proposed motions that I would like the board to
> >> consider. There are two types: one that can take effect immediately,
> >> and one that requires board and membership voting.
> >>
> >> I. For immediate implementation of the current process:
> >>
> >> One of the obstacles that we have found during the process was that
> >> it was kind of hard to get the specs council to deliver the
> >> recommendation in a timely fashion. It has seen some improvement
> >> recently, but we want to make sure to continue it. Thus, I would
> >> like to propose the following:
> >>
> >> BE IT RESOLVED that the OIDF Committee Liason is directed to act as
> >> the coordinator for the specification council so that specification
> >> council create a recommendation for the membership about a formal
> >> working group proposal within 15 days of the complete proposal being
> >> circulated on specs at openid.net to comply to the current OpenID
> >> process.
> >> II. Improvements of curent porcess
> >>
> >> As a longer term solution, I would like to propose the following
> >> three motions. The first two are to make sure the timely and
> >> effective response from the specs council, and the last one is to
> >> protect the OpenID(TM) as well as to make it easier to create a WG
> >> so that all the discussion will be done inside the WG and the output
> >> is IPR clean.
> >>
> >> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
> >> agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should the
> >> specifications council not create a recommendation for the
> >> membership about a formal working group proposal within 15 days of
> >> the complete proposal being circulated on specs at openid.net, then the
> >> proposal may proceed to a membership vote for approval.
> >> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
> >> agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should specs
> >> council members not participate in the discussion of two consecutive
> >> working group proposals, they will be deemed to have resigned, and
> >> new specs council members who are committed to participating in the
> >> process will be appointed to replace them.
> >> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have
> >> agreed to amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft
> >> may claim OpenID trademark until it is ratified to be an
> >> implementor's draft status or full specification status.
> >>
> >> <mime-attachment.ics>_______________________________________________
> >> board-private mailing list
> >> board-private at openid.net
> >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > board-private mailing list
> > board-private at openid.net
> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3772 (20090116) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3772 (20090116) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > board mailing list
> > board at openid.net
> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Messina
> Citizen-Participant &
>  Open Web Advocate-at-Large
>
> factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org
> citizenagency.com # vidoop.com
> This email is:   [ ] bloggable    [X] ask first   [ ] private
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3772 (20090116) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3772 (20090116) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
>



-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-board/attachments/20090117/1e468674/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the board mailing list