[OpenID board] FW: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
Chris Messina
chris.messina at gmail.com
Sat Apr 4 14:48:51 UTC 2009
I've added a few forums to the ideas.openid.net:
- Ideas
- Usability
- Developers
- Marketing
- Security
- Foundation
- Platforms & Implementing
Let me know what you think about these general areas. I'd like to keep the
number of forums limited for now, but I think these reflect areas that I've
seen come up on the mailing list in the past few months.
I could also link these to appropriate mailing lists if that would be
useful.
Once we have AT MINIMUM one topic per forum, I think we could consider
putting up the feedback tab.
Thus, go to it! Start filling in topics! ;)
Chris
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com> wrote:
> And as soon as we’ve got it “seeded” we should put the feedback widget on
> the site to encourage feedback. Right now its buried too deep to
> proactively attract feedback.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Brian
>
> *==============*
>
> *Brian Kissel*
>
> *Cell: 503.866.4424*
>
> *Fax: 503.296.5502*
>
>
>
> *From:* board-bounces at openid.net [mailto:board-bounces at openid.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Brian Kissel
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2009 9:56 PM
>
> *To:* board at openid.net
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] FW: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
>
>
>
> I’d suggest seeding with some of the areas we’ve talked about as priorities
> for 2009 to see if what we think is important is consistent with what the
> members and site visitors feel is important:
>
>
>
> · *1H 2009 Priorities*
>
> o Agree on best practices for UX, major OPs agree to consistently enable
> and support this UX, communicate to RPs
>
> o Agree on phase 1, tier 1 OP capability targets and major OPs
> consistently enable and support these capabilities (data, security, other?)
>
> o Improve developer resources
>
> o Develop and communicate a more clear and cohesive security strategy:
> technology, security community engagement, education, and marcom
>
> o Visible reference deployments in targeted segments: blogs, social
> networking, media, entertainment, sports, personal productivity, and
> affinity groups
>
> o Clear and consistent trademark and brand strategy, especially for B2B
> (OP to RP) initially
>
> o OIDF organization on sound financial footing, appropriate professional
> staff in place, executing on the agreed to priorities and programs
>
> o Begin market research on new market segments: retail, government,
> education – leverage successes and lessons learned in Japan and Europe
>
>
>
> · *2H 2009 Priorities*
>
> o Continue to enhance UX and data offerings (friends, activity stream,
> other)
>
> o Agree on phase 2, tier 1 OP capability targets and major OPs
> consistently enable and support these capabilities (data, security, other?)
>
> o Enhance security and other capabilities (data, PCI compliance,
> non-repudiation, etc.) as required for potential new markets: retail,
> government, education, etc.
>
> o Begin mainstream market awareness and educational outreach (when
> required goals above are achieved)
>
> o Leverage reference deployments (1H goal) into mainstream adoption in
> targeted segments: blogs, social networking, media, entertainment, sports,
> personal productivity, and affinity groups
>
> o Develop and implement B2C (RP to end user) OpenID brand and trademark
> strategy
>
> o Assess and refine OIDF financial and operational structure as
> necessary
>
> o Develop 2010 plan
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Brian
>
> *==============*
>
> *Brian Kissel*
>
> *Cell: 503.866.4424*
>
> *Fax: 503.296.5502*
>
>
>
> *From:* board-bounces at openid.net [mailto:board-bounces at openid.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Chris Messina
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2009 8:54 PM
> *To:* board at openid.net
> *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] FW: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
>
>
>
> What topics should we seed the discussions with?
>
>
>
> Also, my thinking is that Satisfaction should be used for general
> user/customer support problems (i.e. when people have a problem with their
> OpenID, yes, they should go to their provider, but if they forget who their
> provider is, if it goes down, or any number of other problems, at least we
> can aggregate common answers to such problems for the betterment of the
> OpenID brand).
>
>
>
> For UserVoice, I think we use it to collect ideas and votes on those ideas
> — both for the technology and the priorities of the foundation. Of course
> nothing on UV will be binding, but these kinds of solutions have a lower
> barrier to entry than joining a mailing list.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Scott Kveton <scott at kveton.com> wrote:
>
> Seems like the best way to get questions is to put it up there so
> people can enter them in. Topics make sense to me as well. I say get
> it up as fast as possible to start taking feedback.
>
> - Scott
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:11 AM, David Recordon <david at sixapart.com>
> wrote:
> > Hey Brian,
> > The feedback that I provided to Chris was that I thought we should start
> > getting UserVoice active before we promote it so heavily on the site.
> > Currently they're are two ideas, but if we can get up over ten or so I
> > think it will become much clearly to new visitors how to use it and the
> sort
> > of thing that is expected. I also believe that we can setup "topics" in
> > UserVoice and I'd encourage us to do so to separate ideas between the
> > Foundation and technology. I also wonder how we plan to integrate
> UserVoice
> > and GetSatisfaction, or if we still do.
> > Basically, I want us to have a plan and some engagement on UserVoice
> before
> > it becomes the most prominent thing on the site.
> > --David
> > On Mar 30, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Brian Kissel wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Chris has gotten UserVoice hooked up on the OpenID.net website, you can
> see
> > it at the bottom of the page under “Discuss/Ideas” Thanks Chris!
> >
> > <image002.png>
> >
> > I’m suggesting that we also implement the “feedback widget” which makes
> it
> > more clear how to use the feedback tool. You can see UserVoice’s widget
> at
> > UserVoice on the left hand side of the page. Anyone have concerns about
> > implementing the “feedback widget” on our site? The advantage is that
> this
> > proactively encourages site visitors to provide feedback. The more
> feedback
> > we get the more we’ll know what the community is looking for from the
> OIDF.
> >
> > <image003.jpg>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Brian
> > ==============
> > Brian Kissel
> > Cell: 503.866.4424
> > Fax: 503.296.5502
> >
> > From: Chris Messina [mailto:chris.messina at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:09 PM
> > To: Brian Kissel
> > Cc: Marcus Nelson; Dave Recordon
> > Subject: Re: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
> >
> > Just as we posted about moving the OpenID code repo to Google Code, I'd
> like
> > to put such a visible feature to the board list first. I can go ahead and
> > make that request if you like. Recordon had more specific thoughts that
> he
> > might be willing to share when he returns this week.
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > What about the “Feedback Widget,” what’s required to implement that? Any
> > reason not to try it?
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > ==============
> >
> > Brian Kissel
> >
> > Cell: 503.866.4424
> >
> > Fax: 503.296.5502
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Chris Messina [mailto:chris.messina at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 6:03 PM
> > To: Marcus Nelson
> > Cc: Brian Kissel; Dave Recordon
> >
> > Subject: Re: UserVoice on OIDF and wiki?
> >
> >
> >
> > Sure, go for it.
> >
> >
> >
> > I simply haven't the time lately to do the kind of design/touch ups I'd
> like
> > to — so if you smooth the integration/design, that'd be swell.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Marcus Nelson <marcus at uservoice.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Guys --
> >
> > You're very welcome! This is a great start, though the UV page looks a
> > little plain. If it's okay with you, we'd like to spruce it up a bit to
> > match the OpenID brand. Would that be okay?
> >
> > --
> > Marcus Nelson
> > UserVoice.com - What do users really want?
> >
> > marcus at uservoice.com
> > mobile: 408.888.2657
> > skype: uservoice
> > twitter: @marcusnelson
> >
> > blog: http://blog.uservoice.com
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/uservoice
> > feedback: http://uservoice.uservoice.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Brian Kissel <bkissel at janrain.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> >
> >
> > Great to see that its up and running now under the “Ideas” link at the
> > bottom of the page, thank you, but I’d guess that most people don’t take
> the
> > time to scroll to the bottom of the footer or even notice the “ideas”
> link.
> > The great thing about the “feedback widget” is that it proactively
> > encourages feedback, which I think is what we want. Would also be good
> to
> > put this on the OIDF wiki site as well. What’s the downside of using the
> > feedback widget? I’m seeing it more places and think it will be good for
> > the OIDF to show that we’re proactively soliciting feedback, not to
> mention
> > that lots of good ideas will come from it as well as the relative
> priorities
> > of requests.
> >
> >
> >
> > By the way Marcus, thanks for your support with this as well, we really
> > appreciate it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <image001.jpg>
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > ==============
> >
> > Brian Kissel
> >
> > Cell: 503.866.4424
> >
> > Fax: 503.296.5502
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
> > database 3976 (20090330) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > board mailing list
> > board at openid.net
> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > board mailing list
> > board at openid.net
> > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Messina
> Citizen-Participant &
> Open Web Advocate
>
> factoryjoe.com // diso-project.org // vidoop.com
> This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3984 (20090402) __________
>
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3984 (20090402) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
--
Chris Messina
Citizen-Participant &
Open Web Advocate
factoryjoe.com // diso-project.org // vidoop.com
This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-board/attachments/20090404/337f7d67/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the board
mailing list