[OpenID board] URGENT: New Board members motion
Nat
sakimura at gmail.com
Tue Nov 4 23:09:44 UTC 2008
+1
=nat at TOKYO via iPhone
On 2008/11/05, at 2:42, David Recordon <drecordon at sixapart.com> wrote:
> If we're in nomination mode, then I'd also like to nominate Snorri
> to join as a community board member (if he is willing to accept that
> nomination). Snorri has done amazing community work internationally
> which should be directly supported by the Foundation.
>
> On Nov 4, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Drummond Reed wrote:
>
>> +1 to all Brian’s points here. I want to clarify again that my obj
>> ection last week was not to moving forward on this – I am very sup
>> portive of adding additional corporate board members immediately -
>> - it was only to the difficulty of closing what turned out to be a
>> contentious issue via an email vote.
>>
>> I am all for holding a vote this week if we want to call a meeting.
>> Worst case we could hold the vote at the BOD meeting next Monday
>> afternoon at IIW. (Have we set an exact time/location for that
>> meeting? Will there be dial-in so all board members can participate
>> if they are not at IIW in person?)
>>
>> Also, in terms of community board members, I would like to nominate
>> Brian Kissel to join as a community board member (if he is willing
>> to accept that nomination). I’d move for that vote to be held at t
>> he same time so he could join the board at the same time as the ne
>> w corporate board members.
>>
>> =Drummond
>>
>> From: board-bounces at openid.net [mailto:board-bounces at openid.net] On
>> Behalf Of Brian Kissel
>> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 4:47 PM
>> To: board at openid.net
>> Subject: Re: [OpenID board] URGENT: New Board members motion
>>
>> +1 with Dick on additional corporate members. I’ve had conversati
>> ons with BBC (Zac Bjelogrlic, Dirk-willem Van.gulik ) and PayPal (
>> Andrew Nash) and know that both organizations would both like to j
>> oin. I don’t know who else in on the list of possible new members
>> , but if we have up to 5 corporate spots to fill and these two fir
>> ms are willing to make a commitment of time and dollars, I think w
>> e should not delay.
>>
>> BBC has already shown their leadership by hosting the Content
>> Provider Advisory Committee meeting in NYC several weeks ago. The
>> y’ve also OpenID enabled RadioPop and are looking at additional pr
>> operties to roll out. They’ve offered to work with NPR (who was a
>> lso at the NYC session) to see if we can get BBC, NPR, PBS, and CB
>> C to collaborate on OpenID enablement initiatives. And in any cas
>> e, we need some large representative RPs on the BOD. As I’ve said
>> before, I think media companies are a next logical adopter of Ope
>> nID, so would welcome BBC’s membership.
>>
>> PayPal would also be great because they have a lot of experience in
>> managing phishing and general security infrastructure and represent
>> the perspective of merchants and payment infrastructure providers,
>> which we need represented on the BOD if we want to continue to
>> expand the applicability and value of OpenID beyond user generated
>> content access.
>>
>> I don’t know if these are the companies we’re thinking about
>> voting on near term, but if so, I would strongly endorse their mem
>> bership. I also agree with Dick that getting the funding commitme
>> nt from these two companies in uncertain financial times is critic
>> al and will actually help with hiring the new ED and coming up wit
>> h a reasonable budget for the various initiatives we’ll want to un
>> dertake in 2009. For those that didn’t see Nat Sakimura’s
>> announcement about OpenID Japan, they are making great progress an
>> d we need to have equally compelling aspirations.
>>
>> With respect to community membership, JanRain would certainly
>> welcome the opportunity to contribute as a BOD member, but we’ll c
>> ontinue to participate via my membership on the Marketing and Cust
>> omer Research Committee regardless.
>>
>> We are working with Research Media to get the OpenID membership
>> polling solution working this week and the BOD election system
>> working next week. Regardless of that, I don’t think we should w
>> ait on the BOD vote the two additional corporate members.
>>
>> There is a lot of good buzz going on right now with the Microsoft
>> and Google announcements. If we could also announce these two new
>> corporate BOD members at IIW, that we can continue to build on that
>> momentum.
>>
>> So, IMHO, we should do the vote on the 2 additional corporate
>> sponsors right now (assuming they are still willing) and finalize
>> them this week. If we want to wait on community members, that’s f
>> ine with me.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Brian
>> ==============
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-board/attachments/20081105/65d1ca26/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the board
mailing list