[OpenID board] Topic for this week's agenda

David Recordon drecordon at sixapart.com
Wed Mar 12 20:20:42 UTC 2008

The community can always just have a lightweight version of voting.   
Someone makes a proposal, others +1 it, boom done.

On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Martin Atkins wrote:

> Drummond Reed wrote:
>> Scott and Bill:
>> Per the thread below, the question of when we will be opening up  
>> new Working
>> Groups for specifications is starting to come up. I'm not saying  
>> there is a
>> compelling reason to do that yet for any spec other than PAPE (and  
>> the
>> Trusted Exchange spec that Nat Sakimura and his team have  
>> suggested), but I
>> do think that OIDF needs to take a public stance about:
>> a) The status of current WGs (to my knowledge it's not published  
>> anywhere
>> what WGs exist or are planned)
>> b) The process for community members to form a WG.
>> Can we put a short discussion about this on this week's agenda?
> It was my understanding that the blocker for this is that we have no
> voting system through which we can hold a vote for the creation of a  
> WG.
> Obviously that is in hand per our discussions at the last meeting.
> However, I guess we could discuss an interim plan to get the first few
> WGs up and running quickly. It'd be nice if these could be up and
> running by IIW so that the WGs can potentially present to the  
> community
> what they've been up to.
> _______________________________________________
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board

More information about the board mailing list