[OpenID board] Topic for this week's agenda
drummond.reed at cordance.net
Mon Mar 10 21:14:28 UTC 2008
Good point, Martin. +1 to doing this before IIW.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: board-bounces at openid.net [mailto:board-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf
> Of Martin Atkins
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: board at openid.net
> Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Topic for this week's agenda
> Drummond Reed wrote:
> > Scott and Bill:
> > Per the thread below, the question of when we will be opening up new
> > Groups for specifications is starting to come up. I'm not saying there
> is a
> > compelling reason to do that yet for any spec other than PAPE (and the
> > Trusted Exchange spec that Nat Sakimura and his team have suggested),
> but I
> > do think that OIDF needs to take a public stance about:
> > a) The status of current WGs (to my knowledge it's not published
> > what WGs exist or are planned)
> > b) The process for community members to form a WG.
> > Can we put a short discussion about this on this week's agenda?
> It was my understanding that the blocker for this is that we have no
> voting system through which we can hold a vote for the creation of a WG.
> Obviously that is in hand per our discussions at the last meeting.
> However, I guess we could discuss an interim plan to get the first few
> WGs up and running quickly. It'd be nice if these could be up and
> running by IIW so that the WGs can potentially present to the community
> what they've been up to.
> board mailing list
> board at openid.net
More information about the board