[OpenID board] Further discussion ...

[Scott Kveton]

In the interest of harmony, I'm interested in hearing the proposal from
David, Bill and Artur.  Yes, we lose a couple of days but I think it will
help in giving us a united front if most/all of us are in agreement about a
proposal from which to start.  Again, we're not deciding on exactly how the
organization will manifest itself, we're trying to get to a first-run
proposal that we can float to the community.

Dick: I hope you don't feel like your efforts were wasted.  You're helping
to move this discussion along greatly even if we don't end up going with
your proposal.  I imagine we'll end up with a hybrid but only time will
tell.

I look forward to seeing the new proposal tomorrow morning.

Let's do a call this Thursday at the regular time to come to an agreement
about what we're going to propose.

Looking forward to it,

- Scott




On 4/6/07 2:43 PM, "Johannes Ernst" <jernst at netmesh.us> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Apr 6, 2007, at 14:28, Recordon, David wrote:
>> While Drummond, Artur, or myself not being able to
>> attend the meeting yesterday is certainly no excuse for holding up
>> work,
>> I would also have hoped that those present would have taken this
>> ongoing
>> task into account and not made a decision given the importance and
>> impact of these proposals.
> 
> As I recall the discussion yesterday -- and I hope the minutes will
> concur -- the proposal to "simply proceed on this important matter by
> decision of those present" was rejected, and instead we decided to
> proceed only after the input of those not present was sought on this
> matter, specifically for the objective that nobody on the board had
> to dissent from the proposal put forward to the community.
> 
> Which is exactly what seems to be occurring right now whether we know
> it or not ;-)
> 
> It would still be my hope that we could find a way that works (on an
> 80-20 basis) for all of us, instead of having a true split opinion on
> this on the board.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> Johannes.
> 
> 
> 
> Johannes Ernst
> NetMesh Inc.
> 
>