[OpenID board] Further discussion ...
scott at janrain.com
Mon Apr 9 17:30:38 UTC 2007
In the interest of harmony, I'm interested in hearing the proposal from
David, Bill and Artur. Yes, we lose a couple of days but I think it will
help in giving us a united front if most/all of us are in agreement about a
proposal from which to start. Again, we're not deciding on exactly how the
organization will manifest itself, we're trying to get to a first-run
proposal that we can float to the community.
Dick: I hope you don't feel like your efforts were wasted. You're helping
to move this discussion along greatly even if we don't end up going with
your proposal. I imagine we'll end up with a hybrid but only time will
I look forward to seeing the new proposal tomorrow morning.
Let's do a call this Thursday at the regular time to come to an agreement
about what we're going to propose.
Looking forward to it,
On 4/6/07 2:43 PM, "Johannes Ernst" <jernst at netmesh.us> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2007, at 14:28, Recordon, David wrote:
>> While Drummond, Artur, or myself not being able to
>> attend the meeting yesterday is certainly no excuse for holding up
>> I would also have hoped that those present would have taken this
>> task into account and not made a decision given the importance and
>> impact of these proposals.
> As I recall the discussion yesterday -- and I hope the minutes will
> concur -- the proposal to "simply proceed on this important matter by
> decision of those present" was rejected, and instead we decided to
> proceed only after the input of those not present was sought on this
> matter, specifically for the objective that nobody on the board had
> to dissent from the proposal put forward to the community.
> Which is exactly what seems to be occurring right now whether we know
> it or not ;-)
> It would still be my hope that we could find a way that works (on an
> 80-20 basis) for all of us, instead of having a true split opinion on
> this on the board.
> Johannes Ernst
> NetMesh Inc.
More information about the board