[OpenID board] Further discussion ...

Recordon, David drecordon at verisign.com
Fri Apr 6 21:44:22 UTC 2007


Then if that was the decision yesterday I fail to see what the problem
is.?.

--David 

-----Original Message-----
From: board-bounces at openid.net [mailto:board-bounces at openid.net] On
Behalf Of Johannes Ernst
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 2:43 PM
To: board at openid.net
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Further discussion ...


On Apr 6, 2007, at 14:28, Recordon, David wrote:
> While Drummond, Artur, or myself not being able to attend the meeting 
> yesterday is certainly no excuse for holding up work, I would also 
> have hoped that those present would have taken this ongoing task into 
> account and not made a decision given the importance and impact of 
> these proposals.

As I recall the discussion yesterday -- and I hope the minutes will
concur -- the proposal to "simply proceed on this important matter by
decision of those present" was rejected, and instead we decided to
proceed only after the input of those not present was sought on this
matter, specifically for the objective that nobody on the board had to
dissent from the proposal put forward to the community.

Which is exactly what seems to be occurring right now whether we know it
or not ;-)

It would still be my hope that we could find a way that works (on an
80-20 basis) for all of us, instead of having a true split opinion on
this on the board.

Cheers,



Johannes.



Johannes Ernst
NetMesh Inc.





More information about the board mailing list